US Vogue has apologised
for "missing the mark" by saying Zayn Malik and his girlfriend Gigi
Hadid were "embracing gender fluidity".
In an interview, the former One Directioner and the US model
talked about borrowing each other's clothes.
They were photographed in colourful, fairly androgynous clothes.
But readers mocked the magazine for its definition of the phrase,
pointing out that what you wear does not make you "gender fluid".
Many on social media pointed out that the term refers to people
with a particular transgender identity, who do not conform to societal
expectations of male or female or identify as either.
For instance Jacob Tobia wrote in Cosmopolitan: "If you're
going to talk about a marginalised community, talk to that community.
"Unlike how this new Vogue cover shoot presents it, the lived
experience of being gender-nonconforming is rarely that fun and
glamorous."
Vogue writer Maya Singer comments in the piece, in US Vogue's
August issue, that for many young people "gender is a more or less
arbitrary distraction" and that there is "a terrific opportunity for
play".
She says "this new blase attitude toward gender codes marks a
radical break", adding: "For these millennials, at least,
descriptives like boy or girl rank pretty low on the list of important
qualities - and the way they dress reflects that."
'Such a big jump'
But poet Tyler Ford, who's quoted in the accompanying article
exploring gender norms, tweeted (with an eyeroll emoji): "The only mention
of the word 'trans' is by me via interview."
Journalist and author Hannah Orenstein said she would have
preferred Tyler to have been profiled instead of Hadid and Malik, tweeting:
"Zayn and Gigi are profiled in this piece on gender fluidity because...
they borrow each other's clothes sometimes?"
Another reader noted on Twitter: "Y'all notice Zayn isn't out
here wearing dresses."
And Colette Fahy wrote: "All Z & G say is that they
borrow each other's clothes. Such a big jump for the mag to declare gender
fluidity."
In a statement issued on Friday, a Vogue spokeswoman said:
"The story was intended to highlight the impact the gender-fluid,
non-binary communities have had on fashion and culture.
"We are very sorry the story did not correctly reflect that
spirit - we missed the mark.
"We do look forward to continuing the conversation with
greater sensitivity."
No comments:
Post a Comment